Today the ChicagoTribune.com published an article entitled "Russian hackers target U.S., Europe for profit and politics". Clearly there is a threat here and a risk to anyone who uses email, who shops on line, or who accesses personal data on line. These threats have been around for some time but they seem to be moving from teenage hacker mischief to sophisticated criminal money-making operations. The Russian government has proven to be inept or maybe uninterested in stopping these criminals.
Yet the greatest source of malware and SPAM is the good ole US of A, according to the Security Threat Report: 2009 from Sophos. Yes, we are #1! And the US government appears to be equally inept or maybe uninterested in stopping these criminals.
Sophos's key "statistics and findings at a glance":
- Biggest malware threats - SQL injection attacks against websites and the rising tide of scareware
- New web infections - one new infected webpage discovered by Sophos every four and a half seconds (Three times faster than in 2007)
- Malicious email attachments - five times more at end of 2008 than at the beginning
- USA hosts the most malware on the web (37 percent), usurping China's position in 2007
- USA computers relay the most spam (17.5 percent)
- Increasing allegations of state-sponsored cybercrime, as China, North Korea, Russia and Georgia amongst those accused of espionage and assaults via the Internet
It appears we have found the enemy and he is us.
Why such a problem? The infrastructure of the Internet and the hardware and software running PCs predates the Internet and was designed for access and not security. It can never be made secure due to architectural design limitations. Also, we base many of our defenses at the PC level and not within the basic infrastructure of the web. This is like trying to stop terrorists when you answer your front door. The problem is illustrated on the security page of PC World.
So what can we do? As I have been saying for some time, the cheapest, easiest and most impactful change is to authenticate the DNS by adopting DNSSEC. DNSSEC will expose the fake web sites and it is essential to stopping SPAM.
The US Government is showing some leadership here by signing the .gov zone next month and requiring agencies to adopt DNSSEC in 2009. I assume the .mil zone will be doing this shortly also, as that zone is under frequent attack (see Cyber attack has Pentagon worried).
The next thing the US Government can do is to sign the root zone. A signed root will spur DNSSEC adoption although it is not required for individual entities to adopt DNSSEC.
These are two easy steps. They will save everyone a lot of money, will spur the economy through technologies and applications that use the authentication DNSSEC provides, and they will improve confidence in Internet communications. There is no downside and little expense involved.
We don't need a cyber czar or a commission to do this. It is time to act.